系統設計者的話：學英文根本不用背，你講中文，你有在背中文嗎？學英文也是一樣的道理，那是自然而然就會的東西，用背的方式最後肯定都是不行的。 更多...

最好的學習就是有英文的父母，不斷的跟你說話、耐心的教導你，時間長了，你也就慢慢就融入其中了。

但是我們沒有英文父母怎麼辦？看影片學英文就學的起來嗎？學不起來。

我們從小到大，也看過了不少英文電影，至少也看過1、200部也跑不掉，但是為什麼看了這麼多的英文電影，英文還是很爛呢？

主要的原因是我們沒有從基礎性的強化學習。舉個例子，西方的幼兒出生時，他至少聽了各種大人講英文至少聽了2年，才慢慢開始說英文、與大人互動。

而且都是一字一句慢慢的說、慢慢的教、漸進式的、慢慢的、越來越習慣、越來越聽的懂、越來越會說的過程。

那麼我們看的影片、電影過程中，都是大人成熟型的講話速度、方式、語調，我們怎麼可能跟的上？

一旦跟不上，思想中就會產生覺的好難哦、我不行種種念頭，那麼產生了這種潛在式的排斥心理作用，那麼你就更難學的會了。


所以我們必須打好基礎、深厚的基礎，萬丈高樓平地起，唯有打下深厚的基礎，後面你走的路才會越來越順。

程式界裏有句話，程式債欠的越多，最後就只能放棄。學英文也是一樣，英文單字債欠的越多，你就直接上來文法、句型、語調，最後也只能放棄。

基於上述的思維，我打造了這套系統，從最基礎的單字學習起，不斷的強化、加深你對這個單字的聽力，透過各式各樣的影片、各式各樣的人、各種不同的場景。

就只是為了訓練一個單字的聽力，無數的人跟你講同一個單字，講個20遍、50篇、100遍(且不重覆)，我就不信學不起來。


這套系統做出來後，我自己在使用的過程中，確實真的能聽出來他們講的這個單字，而且他們講的速度再快也能聽的出來。

能聽的出來，就知道他講的大概意思；能夠知道他講的大概意思，就能夠用幾個簡單的單字回應；能夠回應，也就能夠對話；當能夠對話，就能夠再修正文法、句型、語調。


我的目地就是希望自己至少能聽的懂人家在說什麼，用英文跟人家對話，大家共同努力、學習。若有其它想法或對這套系統設計的建議，也可以與我聯絡：ichich2013@gmail.com

EdgeConf 3: Pointers and Interactions
觀看次數：675
about
pointers
and
interactions
a
topic
which
we've
got
over
here
the
lovely
patrick
lauke
patrick
lauke
inaudible
jorik
tangelder
at
the
end
there
jorik
is
the
author
of
hammerjs
patrick--
I
didn't
tell
what
you
actually
But
he's
now
an
accessibility
consultant
at
paciello
Pete
is
very
much
ux
focused
and
he's
PETE
SMART
partner-in-crime
Rob
hawkes
incredible
3d
visualization
inaudible
which
describes
my
last
50
days
organizing
MARTIN
beeby
rick
byers
is
from
Google
And
he'll
be
talking
about
pointers
and
interactions
rick
byers
Thanks
APPLAUSE
Let
me
get
my
slides
displaying
here
rick
byers
All
right
i'm
here
to
talk
pointers
and
interactions
on
the
chrome
team
and
that
I
should
re-prioritize
janky
when
you're
scrolling
interfaces
and
frankly
it's
easier
got
a
problem
with
rationality
and
I
think
we've
lost
some
richness
and
rationality
and
rationality
or
if
it's
variable
latency--
if
you've
got
latency
jank--
then
there's
been
a
ton
of
talk
about
the
300
millisecond
click
delay
shipping
in
chrome
35
And
we
continuously
have
been
making
tooling
better
But
for
now
it's
there
on
chrome
tracing
So
then
in
terms
of
richness
the
biggest--
this
And
this
comes
back
to
the
extensible
Web
manifesto
to
agree
between
browsers
and
the
high-level
features
what
are
the
core
primitives
what's
the
kernel
that
all
browsers
are
in
different
frameworks
but
they're
having
to
wait
for
the
long
drawn-out
sanders
process
and
agreements
between
all
the
browser
vendors
there's
a
great
library
called
iscroll
that
customizes
scrolling
in
various
ways--
you've
it's
going
to
make
it
jankier
depending
on
the
browser
you
may
not
on
most--
on
mobile
devices
anyway--
one
css
pixels
more
about
velocities
that
the
browser
has
I
think
we
need
to
fix
all
these
low-level
primitives
so
that
somebody
like
iscroll
can
go
and
build
scrolling
that's
we've
made
these
trade-offs
in
the
browsers
and
we've
said
similarly
ie
has
a
great
propos--
microsoft
has
the
Snap
Points
feature
in
ie
that
is
a
great
feature
it's
a
problem
for
rationality
because
you're
not
you
never
see
checkerboarding
I
would
rather
have
scroll
jank
than
checkerboarding
And
I
think
it's
been
naive
of
us
as
browser
renderers
to
say
But
in
chrome
as
soon
as
you
start
scrolling
And
that's
terrible
for
richness
OK
now
in
terms
of
rationality
one
of
the
topics
we've
been
working
on
standardizing
it
Even
old
school
stuff
like
directional
pads
on
tvs
microsoft
has
perceptive
pixel
these
gigantic
touchscreens
and
track
100
different
touchpoints
haptics--
what
if
your
touchscreens
going
to
innovate
on
chrome
that's
it
I
couldn't
read
it
website
and
iframes
to
the
browser--
what
patrick
lauke
it's
a
difficult
one
I
can
do
scroll
jacking
but
now
extending
haha--
is
that--
there'll
be
a
lot
of
these
cheap
laughs
I
promise--
is
that
yeah
we
do
want
to
innovate
say
well
we
have--
i'll
say
"we"
even
though
i'm
not
in
that
fold
anymore--
we
as
browser
developers
know
what's
it's
a
tough
balancing
act
to
make
MARTIN
beeby
jorik
you're
developing
Hammer
And
we
actually--
I
think
it's
fixed
in
to
be
had
for
gestures
which
universally
Why
don't
we
try--
scrolljacking
for
example
customize
it
slightly
and--
I
don't
know
if
you
guys
experience
this--
but
you're
scrolling
through
a
web
page
And
that's
an
area
which
we've
tried
to
innovate
in
iframes--
Maps
is
a
great
example--
It
was
a
responsive
website
there's
a
big
old
map
the
interface
gets
changed
it's
now
double-tap
to
zoom
You
can't
really
do
that
automatically
to
make
decisions
on
that
MARTIN
beeby
Next
question
andre
brovens
than
standardizing
a
set
of
gestures
MARTIN
beeby
jorik
your
library's
a
lot
about
gestures
jorik
tangelder
Yes
you
should
be
with
a
weird
thing--
I
don't
know--
it's
maybe
not
for
the
uninitiated
of
fancy
gestures
touch
gestures
That
said
I
think
it's
essential--
we
can't
innovate
there's
going
to
be
some--
the
next
viral
app
that's
people
to
make
decisions
about
gestures
don't
mean
to
be
offending
anyone
patrick
lauke
it's
definitely
more
of
a
ux
question
has
in
ie
that
isn't
specced
to
the
w3c
which
programmatically
what
a
gesture
is
the
angle
et
cetera
luke
w
Has
documented
a
lot
of
the
standards
gestures
We
can
create
gestures
We
can
hijack
pointers
moderator
steven
you're
quite
involved
Do
you
think
we
need
more
standardization
in
this
whole
inaudible
of
gestures
I
think
it's
mondo
ui
UNKNOWN
indy
ui
but
relates
to
actually
system-wide
commands
of
this
from
microsoft
implementations
that
are
probably
you're
interacting
in
3d
space
to
start
exploring
custom
gestures
Looking
at
how
to
do
gestures
in
3d
space--
touch
gestures
in
those
spaces
rather
than
kind
of
replicating
two-
standardize
more
moderator
You
were
talking
about
new
devices
need
to
be
agnostic
we're
looking
at
non-traditional
forms
of
input
a
higher-level
semantic
rick
byers
there's
also
this
chicken
and
egg
you've
got
to
design
for
compatibility
right
patrick
lauke
I
mean
I
agree
there's
all
these
new
interfaces
it's
been
a
bit
sidelined
because
it
falls
under
the
main--
oh
its
accessibility
OK
we're
going
to
have
stylist
Touch
that's
pointer-like
moderator
So
we've
got
a
question
patrick
lauke
Absolutely
they're
high-level
enough
and
they're
abstracted
enough
compatibility
events
on-mouse
over
on-mouse
out
when
we
started
inventing
these
very
device-specific
event
handlers
needs
to--
at
the
ua
level--
fire
these
compatibility
to
end
up
perpetuating
this
It
needs
to
emulate
pointer
events
which
to
pcs
and
smartphones
that
have
browsers
in
them
we're
talking
about--
tvs
aren't
getting
there
they're
not
we've
got
matt
Andrew
moderator
Sorry
moderator
Yeah
because
you've
got
to
support--
you
say
well
rick
byers
And
we
can't
stop
supporting
what
we've
already
supported
to
make
sure
we're
not
introducing
something
So
i'm
the
ui
lead
on
yelpcom
say
OK
I
want
to
implement
pointer
interactions
What
browser
is
it
supported
on
And
i'll
go
10
and
11
of
our
user
base--
they
probably
aren't
and
put
pointer
events
in
there
instead--
even
of
a
300
millisecond
click
time
business
standpoint--
actually
selling
pointer
events
i'm
telling
you
it's
really--
yeah
And
it's
hard
to--
moderator
Stuff
happens
it's
extraordinarily
complex
we've
got
to
do
a
better
job
of
documenting
it
It
was
all
done
retroactively
to
try
pointer
BOUNCE
we've
got
to
do
some
of
this
stuff
for
compatibility
to
make
it
simpler
and
their
compatibility
modes
and
what
the
differences
are
over
with
frameworks
to
fire
mouse
compatibility
events
and
we're
moving
towards
a
multi-import
world
patrick
lauke
Tension
patrick
lauke
We
didn't
start
the
fire
patrick
lauke
it's
like
Space
invaders
what's
going
on
patrick
lauke
This
has
escalated
patrick
lauke
accessibility
We
are
in
a
multi-import
world
patrick
lauke
Thanks
Subtle
way--
AUDIENCE
Are
pointer
events
over-complicating
touch
interactions
patrick
lauke
No
patrick
lauke
No
they--
oh
sorry
AUDIENCE
i'm
aware
that
moderators
So
yeah
I
mean
are
they
over-complicating
patrick
lauke
As
a
real
developer
MARTIN
beeby
From
a
developer's
point
of
view
you've
got
tablets
then
you've
got
laptops
pointer
events
are
over-complicating
it
kind
of
devices
we're
going
to
have
of
from
these
differences
where
pointer
events
unifies
it
all
switch
gig
currently
doesn't
do
patrick
lauke
Well
I
think
with
pointer
events
It
doesn't
over-complicate
it
And
instead
with--
inaudible
OK
care
how
the
user
pressed
on
something
activated
a
button
this
button
was
activated
So
it
unifies
it
So
that's
what's
been
extended
completely
agnostic
input
agnostic
code
for
pointer
events
for
catching
the
up
event
is
that
the
programmer
hasn't
told
the
browser
what
natasha
rooney
d-pads
TV
screens
and
multiple
users
interacting
on
a
single
screen
are
all
scenarios
we
currently
consider
nontraditional
MARTIN
beeby
Which
will
become--
this
is
kinds
of--
jorik
tangelder
All
of
them
rick
byers
If
I
knew
I
think
our
standardization
we'd
say
here's
the
future
patrick
lauke
let's
patent
it
rick
byers
Awkward
patrick
lauke
i'm
allowed
now
I
don't
work
for
a
browser
anymore
rick
byers
But
it's
because
we
don't
But
with
a
kinects
you're
10
meters
away
I
mean
that's
not
really--
it's
kind
of
mainstream
and
interject
with--
if
they're
ever
interactive
are
basically
a
web
browser
screen
And
there's
actually
direct
implications
They
don't
realize
they're
doing
it
they're
all
powered
by
the
browser
of
installations
that's
not
mainstream
But
not--
The
technology's
moved
into
this
non-web
scenario
But
actually
you're
now
passively
interacting
with
it
you're
now
using
gestures
on
your
phone
patrick
lauke
We
should
MARTIN
beeby
standardization

相關影片

加Line好友 每日8AM 推播1單字

加入好友

其他人正在學習的單字

1. another
2024-04-30 11:42
2. see
2024-04-30 11:42
3. awkward
2024-04-30 11:42
4. data
2024-04-30 11:42
5. such
2024-04-30 11:42
6. luxury
2024-04-30 11:42
7. gets
2024-04-30 11:41
8. took
2024-04-30 11:41
9. football
2024-04-30 11:41
10. wet
2024-04-30 11:41
11. tin
2024-04-30 11:41
12. baby
2024-04-30 11:41
13. hygienist
2024-04-30 11:41
14. too
2024-04-30 11:41
15. of
2024-04-30 11:41

本月觀看影片單字排行榜

本月查閱單字排行榜

本月聆聽單字排行榜