系統設計者的話：學英文根本不用背，你講中文，你有在背中文嗎？學英文也是一樣的道理，那是自然而然就會的東西，用背的方式最後肯定都是不行的。 更多...

最好的學習就是有英文的父母，不斷的跟你說話、耐心的教導你，時間長了，你也就慢慢就融入其中了。

但是我們沒有英文父母怎麼辦？看影片學英文就學的起來嗎？學不起來。

我們從小到大，也看過了不少英文電影，至少也看過1、200部也跑不掉，但是為什麼看了這麼多的英文電影，英文還是很爛呢？

主要的原因是我們沒有從基礎性的強化學習。舉個例子，西方的幼兒出生時，他至少聽了各種大人講英文至少聽了2年，才慢慢開始說英文、與大人互動。

而且都是一字一句慢慢的說、慢慢的教、漸進式的、慢慢的、越來越習慣、越來越聽的懂、越來越會說的過程。

那麼我們看的影片、電影過程中，都是大人成熟型的講話速度、方式、語調，我們怎麼可能跟的上？

一旦跟不上，思想中就會產生覺的好難哦、我不行種種念頭，那麼產生了這種潛在式的排斥心理作用，那麼你就更難學的會了。


所以我們必須打好基礎、深厚的基礎，萬丈高樓平地起，唯有打下深厚的基礎，後面你走的路才會越來越順。

程式界裏有句話，程式債欠的越多，最後就只能放棄。學英文也是一樣，英文單字債欠的越多，你就直接上來文法、句型、語調，最後也只能放棄。

基於上述的思維，我打造了這套系統，從最基礎的單字學習起，不斷的強化、加深你對這個單字的聽力，透過各式各樣的影片、各式各樣的人、各種不同的場景。

就只是為了訓練一個單字的聽力，無數的人跟你講同一個單字，講個20遍、50篇、100遍(且不重覆)，我就不信學不起來。


這套系統做出來後，我自己在使用的過程中，確實真的能聽出來他們講的這個單字，而且他們講的速度再快也能聽的出來。

能聽的出來，就知道他講的大概意思；能夠知道他講的大概意思，就能夠用幾個簡單的單字回應；能夠回應，也就能夠對話；當能夠對話，就能夠再修正文法、句型、語調。


我的目地就是希望自己至少能聽的懂人家在說什麼，用英文跟人家對話，大家共同努力、學習。若有其它想法或對這套系統設計的建議，也可以與我聯絡：ichich2013@gmail.com

Native BigInts in JavaScript: A Case Study in TC39 - Daniel Ehrenberg - JSConf EU 2018
觀看次數：417
52
bits
So
the
8
888
rounds
to
900
to
remove
it
because
of
compatibility
rounds
up
to
the
same
28
it's
not
optimisable
so
the
javascript
engine
can't
use
knowledge
of
mathematics
to
make
Is
this
javascript
bigint
is
at
stage
3
in
tc39
and
we
are
adding
it
to
the
javascript
programming
language
is
bigint
is
being
supported
What
is
tc39
do
my
javascript
in
es6
gave
you
nice
features
like
destructuring
in
the
committee
are
javascript
developers
implementers
people
who
are
making
javascript
work
in
web
browsers
and
node
and
babel
and
it's
ready
to
go
off
to
implementers
than
chrome
and
node
unsigned
64-bit
integers
been
user-de
fined
data
types
so
user-defined
primitives
programmer
whole
value-type
package
in
64
and
unsigned
in
64
was
proposed
as
a
standalone
proposal
did
in
tc39
is
create
this
sound
distorted
out
of
bounds
than
n64
large
integer
2
to
the
53
plus
15
float-point
values
that
relates
to
this
new
feature
so
it
includes
some
insertions
deletions
and
some
new
sections
My
co-work
er
robyn
templeton
implemented
bigint
in
spidermonkey
which
is
currently
saying
"yes
we
want
to
to
this
feature"
stage
2
is
"we
want
to
do
this
feature"
as
numeric
values
We
did
that
same
behaviour
in
bigint
In
this
second
case
accidentally
we
were
converting
bigint
to
a
number
and
it
wouldn't
suite
that
verifies
that
implementations
are
working
right
so
we
have
those
conformance
tests
A
full
request
there's
still
more
refactor
to
go
do
for
that
and
two
implementations
Test
262
tests
there's
a
project
to
implement
tests
for
the
javascript
language
itself
or
different
javascript
implementations
have
different
behaviour
because
different
people
programming
a
lot
of
programmers
have
an
intuition
that
variables
should
have
particular
in
javascript
so
through
implementations
it's
not
just
about
getting
javascript
to
developers
all
these
three
implementations
of
bigint
that
are
in
progress
have
contributed
it's
an
organisational
membership

相關影片

加Line好友 每日8AM 推播1單字

加入好友

其他人正在學習的單字

1. looks
2024-05-09 09:08
2. yeah
2024-05-09 09:08
3. behind
2024-05-09 09:08
4. days
2024-05-09 09:08
5. using
2024-05-09 09:08
6. hopefully
2024-05-09 09:07
7. rendered
2024-05-09 09:07
8. commissioner
2024-05-09 09:07
9. year
2024-05-09 09:07
10. there
2024-05-09 09:07
11. logical
2024-05-09 09:07
12. beans
2024-05-09 09:07
13. holes
2024-05-09 09:07
14. case
2024-05-09 09:07
15. bug
2024-05-09 09:07

本月觀看影片單字排行榜

本月查閱單字排行榜

本月聆聽單字排行榜