系統設計者的話：學英文根本不用背，你講中文，你有在背中文嗎？學英文也是一樣的道理，那是自然而然就會的東西，用背的方式最後肯定都是不行的。 更多...

最好的學習就是有英文的父母，不斷的跟你說話、耐心的教導你，時間長了，你也就慢慢就融入其中了。

但是我們沒有英文父母怎麼辦？看影片學英文就學的起來嗎？學不起來。

我們從小到大，也看過了不少英文電影，至少也看過1、200部也跑不掉，但是為什麼看了這麼多的英文電影，英文還是很爛呢？

主要的原因是我們沒有從基礎性的強化學習。舉個例子，西方的幼兒出生時，他至少聽了各種大人講英文至少聽了2年，才慢慢開始說英文、與大人互動。

而且都是一字一句慢慢的說、慢慢的教、漸進式的、慢慢的、越來越習慣、越來越聽的懂、越來越會說的過程。

那麼我們看的影片、電影過程中，都是大人成熟型的講話速度、方式、語調，我們怎麼可能跟的上？

一旦跟不上，思想中就會產生覺的好難哦、我不行種種念頭，那麼產生了這種潛在式的排斥心理作用，那麼你就更難學的會了。


所以我們必須打好基礎、深厚的基礎，萬丈高樓平地起，唯有打下深厚的基礎，後面你走的路才會越來越順。

程式界裏有句話，程式債欠的越多，最後就只能放棄。學英文也是一樣，英文單字債欠的越多，你就直接上來文法、句型、語調，最後也只能放棄。

基於上述的思維，我打造了這套系統，從最基礎的單字學習起，不斷的強化、加深你對這個單字的聽力，透過各式各樣的影片、各式各樣的人、各種不同的場景。

就只是為了訓練一個單字的聽力，無數的人跟你講同一個單字，講個20遍、50篇、100遍(且不重覆)，我就不信學不起來。


這套系統做出來後，我自己在使用的過程中，確實真的能聽出來他們講的這個單字，而且他們講的速度再快也能聽的出來。

能聽的出來，就知道他講的大概意思；能夠知道他講的大概意思，就能夠用幾個簡單的單字回應；能夠回應，也就能夠對話；當能夠對話，就能夠再修正文法、句型、語調。


我的目地就是希望自己至少能聽的懂人家在說什麼，用英文跟人家對話，大家共同努力、學習。若有其它想法或對這套系統設計的建議，也可以與我聯絡：ichich2013@gmail.com

Tim Slatcher: Interactive Visualisations at Scale | JSConf EU 2015
觀看次數：368
This
enables
us
as
front-end
developers
to
build
it
but
i'm
going
to
talk
about
intuitive
and
responsive
but
intuitive
i'm
talking
about
a
user
should
And
responsive
i'm
not
talking
about
responsive
web
let's
talk
about
earthquakes
are
websites
like
this
one
which
have
a
tonne
of
data
spanning
That
isn't
exactly
unintuitive
but
I
can't
zoom
in
seismological
data
is
one
example
i'll
search
for
alaska
for
earthquakes
the
US
geological
survey
has
A
huge
cluster
of
earthquakes
the
other
sensors
charts
individually
but
we
have
a
common
scrub
bar
at
100-hertz
so
over
the
entire
week
that's
responsibly
relational
datasets
traditionally
at
palantir
we've
been
dealing
with
visualise
what
was
going
one
of
romney's
parks
it
is
kind
of
unsurprising
So
in
total
we
have
168000
nodes
with
200000
edges
going
between
driven
nodes
and
edges
you'll
know
there's
a
tonn
of
drawbacks
to
using
the
fancy
reactive
components
we've
built
to
easily
Why
didn't
we
use
svg
3g
we
use
ploddable
for
synchronised
line
charts
hundreds
of
thousands
of
nodes
in
it
all
animating
either
independently
or
in
sync
it
just
doesn't
One
of
the
drawbacks
that
I
was
discussing
was
nodes
selecting
nodes
this
drag
rectangle
box
and
and
all
of
our
nodes
were
easy
to
programme
It
isn't
designed
for
this
behaviour
profiling
and
optimisations
rendering
to
an
image
essentially
rasterising
the
node
hugely
different
we
initialise
our
scene
scene
--
as
we
zoomed
out
responsive
We
used
debounce
We
debounced
the
interactions
and
only
call
render
when
the
user
stops
interacting
a
few
pixels
Again
it
doesn't
really
detract
the
javascript
memory
It
doesn't
detract
vector
tiles
intuitive
and
responsive
user
experience
wherever
you
can
reusing
the
canvas
and
pre-empting
that's
all
I
have

相關影片

加Line好友 每日8AM 推播1單字

加入好友

其他人正在學習的單字

1. standard
2024-05-01 15:40
2. things
2024-05-01 15:40
3. going
2024-05-01 15:40
4. mike
2024-05-01 15:40
5. making
2024-05-01 15:40
6. fetch
2024-05-01 15:40
7. integration
2024-05-01 15:40
8. mentioned
2024-05-01 15:39
9. more
2024-05-01 15:39
10. long
2024-05-01 15:39
11. today
2024-05-01 15:39
12. applications
2024-05-01 15:39
13. views
2024-05-01 15:39
14. cover
2024-05-01 15:39
15. groups
2024-05-01 15:39

本月觀看影片單字排行榜

本月查閱單字排行榜

本月聆聽單字排行榜