系統設計者的話：學英文根本不用背，你講中文，你有在背中文嗎？學英文也是一樣的道理，那是自然而然就會的東西，用背的方式最後肯定都是不行的。 更多...

最好的學習就是有英文的父母，不斷的跟你說話、耐心的教導你，時間長了，你也就慢慢就融入其中了。

但是我們沒有英文父母怎麼辦？看影片學英文就學的起來嗎？學不起來。

我們從小到大，也看過了不少英文電影，至少也看過1、200部也跑不掉，但是為什麼看了這麼多的英文電影，英文還是很爛呢？

主要的原因是我們沒有從基礎性的強化學習。舉個例子，西方的幼兒出生時，他至少聽了各種大人講英文至少聽了2年，才慢慢開始說英文、與大人互動。

而且都是一字一句慢慢的說、慢慢的教、漸進式的、慢慢的、越來越習慣、越來越聽的懂、越來越會說的過程。

那麼我們看的影片、電影過程中，都是大人成熟型的講話速度、方式、語調，我們怎麼可能跟的上？

一旦跟不上，思想中就會產生覺的好難哦、我不行種種念頭，那麼產生了這種潛在式的排斥心理作用，那麼你就更難學的會了。


所以我們必須打好基礎、深厚的基礎，萬丈高樓平地起，唯有打下深厚的基礎，後面你走的路才會越來越順。

程式界裏有句話，程式債欠的越多，最後就只能放棄。學英文也是一樣，英文單字債欠的越多，你就直接上來文法、句型、語調，最後也只能放棄。

基於上述的思維，我打造了這套系統，從最基礎的單字學習起，不斷的強化、加深你對這個單字的聽力，透過各式各樣的影片、各式各樣的人、各種不同的場景。

就只是為了訓練一個單字的聽力，無數的人跟你講同一個單字，講個20遍、50篇、100遍(且不重覆)，我就不信學不起來。


這套系統做出來後，我自己在使用的過程中，確實真的能聽出來他們講的這個單字，而且他們講的速度再快也能聽的出來。

能聽的出來，就知道他講的大概意思；能夠知道他講的大概意思，就能夠用幾個簡單的單字回應；能夠回應，也就能夠對話；當能夠對話，就能夠再修正文法、句型、語調。


我的目地就是希望自己至少能聽的懂人家在說什麼，用英文跟人家對話，大家共同努力、學習。若有其它想法或對這套系統設計的建議，也可以與我聯絡：ichich2013@gmail.com

Trust and digital rights in learned systems (PAIR UX Symposium 2018)
觀看次數：361
work
with
the
organization's
shaping
our
can't
show
you
exact
examples
because
i'd
be
in
breach
of
confidentiality
agreements
I
have
found
examples
to
domain
or
illustrations
from
ifs
blog
to
determinism
as
designers
we
are
used
to
as
designers
we
don't
necessarily
know
interfaces
that
a
user
might
be
shown
as
designing
for
frameworks
for
learned
how
many
of
you
use
spotify
or
itunes
or
services
are
powered
by
learn
systems
in
system
simply
presented
a
user
with
purely
an
individualistic
action
I
think
groups
unions
or
medical
charities
can
means
that
if
you're
designing
a
learned
and
with
civic
institutions
if
you'd
right
to
deletion
in
a
federated
we
make
ephemeral
learning
kossal
possible
in
a
privacy-preserving
way
and
that's
non-deterministic
that
I
organizations
to
make
sure
that
that
doesn't
just
test
a
kind
of
inanimate
deepmind
are
developing
verifiable
data
by
clinicians
to
make
better
decisions
registries
perhaps
of
verified
models
or
testing
institutions
or
organizations
in
have
to
rely
on
organizations
but
they
cambridge
analytic
er
what
happens
if
obfuscated
illegible
or
has
perverse
society
ever
course-correct
you
know
intimidation
of
legal
for
specificity
it's
it's
details
way
it's
it
strikes
me
that
it's
kind
of
to
do
if
that's
I
don't
know
if
that's
a
the
top-level
point
but
the
thing
that's
someone
may
just
fundamentally
not
quantities
of
information
we're
looking
systems
as
code
or
code
as
legal
systems
as
you
well
know
regulatory
environments
providers
builders
have
to
build
things
australia
regulations
are
very
different
facilitating
workshops
to
bring
before
and
as
designers
remember
we're
it's
all
about
incentives
I
think
so
if
because
it's
not
well
resourced
like
course-correct
that's
only
going
to
be
in
ux
and
ui
so
a
lot
of
the
threads
that
user
interface
design
has
kind
of
muddles
which
historically
are
places

相關影片

加Line好友 每日8AM 推播1單字

加入好友

其他人正在學習的單字

1. any
2024-04-28 07:39
2. work
2024-04-28 07:39
3. true
2024-04-28 07:39
4. clean
2024-04-28 07:39
5. refresh
2024-04-28 07:39
6. wall
2024-04-28 07:39
7. leave
2024-04-28 07:39
8. depart
2024-04-28 07:38
9. pages
2024-04-28 07:38
10. licence
2024-04-28 07:38
11. strange
2024-04-28 07:38
12. consideration
2024-04-28 07:38
13. though
2024-04-28 07:37
14. information
2024-04-28 07:37
15. cool
2024-04-28 07:37

本月觀看影片單字排行榜

本月查閱單字排行榜

本月聆聽單字排行榜