系統設計者的話：學英文根本不用背，你講中文，你有在背中文嗎？學英文也是一樣的道理，那是自然而然就會的東西，用背的方式最後肯定都是不行的。 更多...

最好的學習就是有英文的父母，不斷的跟你說話、耐心的教導你，時間長了，你也就慢慢就融入其中了。

但是我們沒有英文父母怎麼辦？看影片學英文就學的起來嗎？學不起來。

我們從小到大，也看過了不少英文電影，至少也看過1、200部也跑不掉，但是為什麼看了這麼多的英文電影，英文還是很爛呢？

主要的原因是我們沒有從基礎性的強化學習。舉個例子，西方的幼兒出生時，他至少聽了各種大人講英文至少聽了2年，才慢慢開始說英文、與大人互動。

而且都是一字一句慢慢的說、慢慢的教、漸進式的、慢慢的、越來越習慣、越來越聽的懂、越來越會說的過程。

那麼我們看的影片、電影過程中，都是大人成熟型的講話速度、方式、語調，我們怎麼可能跟的上？

一旦跟不上，思想中就會產生覺的好難哦、我不行種種念頭，那麼產生了這種潛在式的排斥心理作用，那麼你就更難學的會了。


所以我們必須打好基礎、深厚的基礎，萬丈高樓平地起，唯有打下深厚的基礎，後面你走的路才會越來越順。

程式界裏有句話，程式債欠的越多，最後就只能放棄。學英文也是一樣，英文單字債欠的越多，你就直接上來文法、句型、語調，最後也只能放棄。

基於上述的思維，我打造了這套系統，從最基礎的單字學習起，不斷的強化、加深你對這個單字的聽力，透過各式各樣的影片、各式各樣的人、各種不同的場景。

就只是為了訓練一個單字的聽力，無數的人跟你講同一個單字，講個20遍、50篇、100遍(且不重覆)，我就不信學不起來。


這套系統做出來後，我自己在使用的過程中，確實真的能聽出來他們講的這個單字，而且他們講的速度再快也能聽的出來。

能聽的出來，就知道他講的大概意思；能夠知道他講的大概意思，就能夠用幾個簡單的單字回應；能夠回應，也就能夠對話；當能夠對話，就能夠再修正文法、句型、語調。


我的目地就是希望自己至少能聽的懂人家在說什麼，用英文跟人家對話，大家共同努力、學習。若有其它想法或對這套系統設計的建議，也可以與我聯絡：ichich2013@gmail.com

Evan You on Vue.js: Seeking the Balance in Framework Design | JSConf.Asia 2019
觀看次數：380
on
frameworks
right
i've
learned
a
lot
designs
some
of
the
trade-offs
decisions
when
there's
probably
a
new
javascript
vanilla
javascript
but
we
know
it's
frameworks
to
using
2019
I
just
like
not
marketers
right
but
if
you're
trying
to
what
actually
defers
these
frameworks
so
goals
of
these
frameworks
we
we
all
are
cases
framers
have
to
make
trade-offs
there's
the
state
mechanism
mutable
versus
immutable
dirty-checking
versus
simulated
reactivity
actually
I
won't
excuse
me
so
some
of
the
iconic
examples
end
of
libraries
primitives
and
angular
abstractions
right
so
rarely
exemplifies
lower-level
intentionally
small
so
when
so
that's
right
they're
designed
top-down
where
are
fewer
concepts
to
get
started
with
and
there's
more
flexibility
so
there's
low-level
primitives
so
you
have
a
pretty
much
it
that's
about
that's
stuff
they've
been
cranking
out
in
the
is
there's
more
plumbing
work
needed
abstractions
to
make
yourself
more
components
or
prot
render
props
and
then
lead
to
fragmentation
and
constant
churn
every
day
there's
a
new
css
js
solved
with
building
abstractions
so
if
coherent
ecosystem
right
so
you
don't
you've
only
learned
html
css
and
javascript
reading
the
angular
don't
need
routing
if
you
don't
need
screen
is
it's
shortened
by
removing
do
need
a
router
so
you're
looking
to
actually
does
provider
routers
which
I
making
the
adoption
incremental
we
are
fundamentally
we
have
to
make
sure
the
these
pre
these
pre-built
solutions
it
defines
our
different
user
bases
so
intentional
decisions
in
terms
of
where
ok
so
now
let's
talk
about
rendering
jsx
functions
versus
static
string-based
compliation
based
view
expressions
and
then
there's
expressiveness
versus
raw
pre-act
stencil
infernal
right
and
then
rendering
engine
inside
ember
and
then
template
based
they
compile
template
full
expressiveness
of
javascript
you're
you
can
build
arbitary
it's
really
powerful
and
liberating
terminals
dom
tree
and
diff
diff
diff
diff
diff
compiler
won't
be
able
to
cover
all
the
javascript
because
javascript
is
simply
there
isn't
simply
enough
assumptions
with
javascript
it's
just
really
really
scheduling
concurrent
smote
time
slicing
entering
and
exiting
rendering
all
the
runtime
scheduling
stuff
that's
like
several
20
30
kb
of
javascript
right
and
rendering
code
from
a
template
usually
optimizations
template
compilation
or
in
general
result
in
much
lighter
runtime
baseline
complex
runtime
scheduling
to
trying
to
of
template
compilation
is
obviously
you
are
constrained
by
the
template
syntax
you
lose
the
expressiveness
of
template
but
the
compiler
does
not
pay
compiler
that's
you
won't
be
able
to
light
or
runtime
lighter
base
baseline
verbose
output
per
template
right
example
the
code
that
spouts
produces
compilation
there's
a
there's
a
runtime
and
template
compilation
if
you
actually
right
the
compilation
step
produces
especially
optimized
we
don't
render
and
then
there's
expressiveness
you
can
feel
you're
constrained
by
templates
handwritten
render
functions
view
still
template
there's
only
one
node
that
a
naive
virtual
dom
different
algorithm
have
to
diff
the
props
if
you
don't
want
this
is
a
list
of
1000
v4
iterations
nodes
that
is
a
total
of
12000
for
dynamic
bindings
some
classes
some
bindings
and
we
do
100
runs
take
the
milliseconds
in
current
30
prototype
takes
only
around
54
millicent
that's
the
that's
the
baseline
so
in
optimize
different
things
where
you're
like
for
spelt
right
its
advantages
its
be
used
on
like
even
embedded
devices
components
you
want
the
expressiveness
you're
like
I
like
react
ecosystem
you
landscape
is
like
a
multi-dimensional
between
these
entities
like
you're
their
gravity
navigate
this
multi-dimensional
space

相關影片

加Line好友 每日8AM 推播1單字

加入好友

其他人正在學習的單字

1. chain
2024-05-05 03:49
2. God
2024-05-05 03:49
3. lid
2024-05-05 03:49
4. times
2024-05-05 03:49
5. by
2024-05-05 03:49
6. paramedics
2024-05-05 03:49
7. index
2024-05-05 03:49
8. blackjack
2024-05-05 03:48
9. played
2024-05-05 03:48
10. shown
2024-05-05 03:48
11. thumb
2024-05-05 03:48
12. area
2024-05-05 03:48
13. branch
2024-05-05 03:48
14. think
2024-05-05 03:48
15. image
2024-05-05 03:48

本月觀看影片單字排行榜

本月查閱單字排行榜

本月聆聽單字排行榜