系統設計者的話：學英文根本不用背，你講中文，你有在背中文嗎？學英文也是一樣的道理，那是自然而然就會的東西，用背的方式最後肯定都是不行的。 更多...

最好的學習就是有英文的父母，不斷的跟你說話、耐心的教導你，時間長了，你也就慢慢就融入其中了。

但是我們沒有英文父母怎麼辦？看影片學英文就學的起來嗎？學不起來。

我們從小到大，也看過了不少英文電影，至少也看過1、200部也跑不掉，但是為什麼看了這麼多的英文電影，英文還是很爛呢？

主要的原因是我們沒有從基礎性的強化學習。舉個例子，西方的幼兒出生時，他至少聽了各種大人講英文至少聽了2年，才慢慢開始說英文、與大人互動。

而且都是一字一句慢慢的說、慢慢的教、漸進式的、慢慢的、越來越習慣、越來越聽的懂、越來越會說的過程。

那麼我們看的影片、電影過程中，都是大人成熟型的講話速度、方式、語調，我們怎麼可能跟的上？

一旦跟不上，思想中就會產生覺的好難哦、我不行種種念頭，那麼產生了這種潛在式的排斥心理作用，那麼你就更難學的會了。


所以我們必須打好基礎、深厚的基礎，萬丈高樓平地起，唯有打下深厚的基礎，後面你走的路才會越來越順。

程式界裏有句話，程式債欠的越多，最後就只能放棄。學英文也是一樣，英文單字債欠的越多，你就直接上來文法、句型、語調，最後也只能放棄。

基於上述的思維，我打造了這套系統，從最基礎的單字學習起，不斷的強化、加深你對這個單字的聽力，透過各式各樣的影片、各式各樣的人、各種不同的場景。

就只是為了訓練一個單字的聽力，無數的人跟你講同一個單字，講個20遍、50篇、100遍(且不重覆)，我就不信學不起來。


這套系統做出來後，我自己在使用的過程中，確實真的能聽出來他們講的這個單字，而且他們講的速度再快也能聽的出來。

能聽的出來，就知道他講的大概意思；能夠知道他講的大概意思，就能夠用幾個簡單的單字回應；能夠回應，也就能夠對話；當能夠對話，就能夠再修正文法、句型、語調。


我的目地就是希望自己至少能聽的懂人家在說什麼，用英文跟人家對話，大家共同努力、學習。若有其它想法或對這套系統設計的建議，也可以與我聯絡：ichich2013@gmail.com

[JSConfEU 2009] Douglas Crockford: The State and Future of JavaScript
觀看次數：490
javascript
javascript
is
a
proprietary
microsystems
or
possibly
to
oracle
certain
that
it's
an
open-shut
case
the
stewardship
of
the
ecmo
script
Adobe
mozilla
opera
and
microsoft
and
member
of
vecna
ineptness
rules
are
very
begun
at
netscape
in
1999
and
in
1999
modifications
to
it
in
order
to
try
to
we're
constantly
men
asking
with
cross-site
scripting
attacks
and
my
with
inter
browser
compatibility
and
the
producing
any
compensating
value
in
would
consider
arguments
about
errors
doing
anti-competitive
behavior
which
anti-competitive
the
concern
was
to
try
big
showdown
in
redmond
at
one
of
our
sandbagged
it
except
me
so
microsoft
microsoft
wanted
to
play
hardball
they
grievance
procedures
involving
the
we're
currently
doing
so
microsoft
took
individually
every
feature
that's
going
called
es
31
indicating
that
it
would
lot
of
accusations
made
at
microsoft
and
dominance
in
the
marketplace
and
if
any
they
didn't
want
to
get
tarnished
the
way
that
microsoft
was
getting
tarnished
tolerate
two
proposals
if
we
went
to
the
secretary-general
and
edmonds
president
subset
of
four
but
we
couldn't
agree
on
which
is
that
binary
floating-point
replicated
bug
that
deserves
fixing
failed
432
project
and
it
significantly
improved
the
uniformity
of
floating-point
results
across
different
of
them
had
several
architectures
and
for
doing
floating-point
different
word
sizes
different
mantissa
sizes
different
encodings
different
exponent
sizes
different
biases
different
on
rounding
binary
floating-point
is
poorly
suited
that
binary
floating-point
cannot
accumulates
errors
on
pennies
nickels
working
title
of
I
tripoli
754
r4
I
modes
or
decimal
radix
is
to
some
54
it
what
java
calls
a
float
it's
a
64-bit
a
56
bit
mantissa
there's
an
exponent
biased
is
so
that
you
can
use
integer
comparisons
for
comparison
comparing
normalized
numbers
that's
a
value
of
value
if
floating-point
subtract
is
significantly
slower
than
integer
unbiased
exponent
and
754
our
deck
128
so
it's
now
a
128-bit
integer
we
take
the
integer
path
and
complexity
that's
factored
out
in
other
formats
ibm's
position
has
been
its
754
nothing
it's
just
it's
754
are
and
floating-point
formats
because
they're
advantages
addition
and
subtraction
happen
at
integer
speeds
which
is
the
most
of
what
we're
doing
numerically
is
adding
and
subtracting
that's
a
really
common
fractions
like
1
over
60
or
1
over
360
or
one-third
so
that
1/3
times
you'd
think
disadvantages
six
or
seven
decimal
doesn't
have
a
lot
of
headroom
the
they're
called
x64
again
it's
a
64-bit
number
the
mantissa
is
a
56
bit
integer
decimal
on
Intel
architectures
we
can
it'll
go
really
fast
it
has
disadvantages
it's
repeated
multiplication
and
division
by
in
in
javascript
life
let's
see
go
up
to
ibm
now
is
over
goals
tc39
s
goal
is
to
tripley's
754
our
ibm's
goal
is
to
add
my
appeal
to
ibm
it
is
irresponsible
to
community
if
you're
nave
oat
succeeds
defines
two
languages
and
that's
just
bad
feature
in
it
has
been
exploited
on
that
they're
useless
it's
that
they're
they're
want
to
be
ninjas
out
there
who
these
repairs
so
i'll
not
use
the
of
inevitability
that
would
be
an
evil
syntax
errors
they're
from
on
pre
we
need
to
get
these
organizations
surprisingly
there
is
a
pressure
on
in
javascript
and
so
we've
got
google
and
compiling
in
into
javascript
for
execution
in
the
browser
and
they've
put
a
go-to
statement
in
javascript
yeah
so
the
youngsters
won't
remember
but
on
javascript
it
gets
a
lot
of
flack
for
it
the
same
thing
facebook's
f
bjs
allows
there's
also
a
lot
of
demand
for
begins
so
you
can
have
been
sabar
baterry
crypto
routines
in
javascript
than
crypto
routines
is
you
should
never
be
writing
your
own
crypto
routines
because
blocked
scoped
so
there
you
go
we'll
arguments
the
arguments
of
ray
thing
is
awful
there's
some
new
syntax
that
we
syntactic
language
syntactic
sugar
to
functions
booga
and
looga
which
do
say
well
we
don't
need
variables
in
the
correspondents
because
they're
not
have
put
getters
and
setters
into
dominance
that
ajax
became
viable
so
a
tragically
horrible
bug
in
the
spec
and
if
there's
some
compensating
benefit
or
are
able
to
read
the
specifications
of
block
of
microsoft
who's
our
editor
going
to
be
expansionists
who
have
that
tc39
currently
is
not
acting
in
trade-offs
arm
and
there's
going
to
be
the
guy
who
put
that
feature
and
that's
my
feature
we
really
don't
that's
not
some
third-party
unrelated
to
any
of
us
competitors
it's
free
money
and
who
usefulness
and
it
is
now
a
detriment
and
accountants
so
ecmo
script
to
the
fifth
advocating
any
particular
type
i'm
on
me
is
to
start
implementing
these
why
did
we
remove
arguments
khali
we
capability
leakage
through
arguments
arguments
collie
was
an
important
step
supporting
recursive
functions
and
I
don't
know
128-bit
format
insertion
the
browser
makers
told
us
example
high-speed
json
parsing
is
now
built
into
ie8
and
to
firefox
firefox
happen
so
they're
pretty
constrained
in
parsing
when
you're
running
on
one
of
the
newer
browsers
there's
no
change
except
you're
jason
parson
gets
really

相關影片

加Line好友 每日8AM 推播1單字

加入好友

其他人正在學習的單字

1. link
2024-05-03 05:06
2. have
2024-05-03 05:06
3. flexibility
2024-05-03 05:06
4. known
2024-05-03 05:05
5. stars
2024-05-03 05:05
6. customer
2024-05-03 05:05
7. smaller
2024-05-03 05:05
8. ham
2024-05-03 05:05
9. science
2024-05-03 05:05
10. anna
2024-05-03 05:05
11. light
2024-05-03 05:05
12. whatever
2024-05-03 05:05
13. lower
2024-05-03 05:05
14. couples
2024-05-03 05:05
15. atmosphere
2024-05-03 05:05

本月觀看影片單字排行榜

本月查閱單字排行榜

本月聆聽單字排行榜