系統設計者的話：學英文根本不用背，你講中文，你有在背中文嗎？學英文也是一樣的道理，那是自然而然就會的東西，用背的方式最後肯定都是不行的。 更多...

最好的學習就是有英文的父母，不斷的跟你說話、耐心的教導你，時間長了，你也就慢慢就融入其中了。

但是我們沒有英文父母怎麼辦？看影片學英文就學的起來嗎？學不起來。

我們從小到大，也看過了不少英文電影，至少也看過1、200部也跑不掉，但是為什麼看了這麼多的英文電影，英文還是很爛呢？

主要的原因是我們沒有從基礎性的強化學習。舉個例子，西方的幼兒出生時，他至少聽了各種大人講英文至少聽了2年，才慢慢開始說英文、與大人互動。

而且都是一字一句慢慢的說、慢慢的教、漸進式的、慢慢的、越來越習慣、越來越聽的懂、越來越會說的過程。

那麼我們看的影片、電影過程中，都是大人成熟型的講話速度、方式、語調，我們怎麼可能跟的上？

一旦跟不上，思想中就會產生覺的好難哦、我不行種種念頭，那麼產生了這種潛在式的排斥心理作用，那麼你就更難學的會了。


所以我們必須打好基礎、深厚的基礎，萬丈高樓平地起，唯有打下深厚的基礎，後面你走的路才會越來越順。

程式界裏有句話，程式債欠的越多，最後就只能放棄。學英文也是一樣，英文單字債欠的越多，你就直接上來文法、句型、語調，最後也只能放棄。

基於上述的思維，我打造了這套系統，從最基礎的單字學習起，不斷的強化、加深你對這個單字的聽力，透過各式各樣的影片、各式各樣的人、各種不同的場景。

就只是為了訓練一個單字的聽力，無數的人跟你講同一個單字，講個20遍、50篇、100遍(且不重覆)，我就不信學不起來。


這套系統做出來後，我自己在使用的過程中，確實真的能聽出來他們講的這個單字，而且他們講的速度再快也能聽的出來。

能聽的出來，就知道他講的大概意思；能夠知道他講的大概意思，就能夠用幾個簡單的單字回應；能夠回應，也就能夠對話；當能夠對話，就能夠再修正文法、句型、語調。


我的目地就是希望自己至少能聽的懂人家在說什麼，用英文跟人家對話，大家共同努力、學習。若有其它想法或對這套系統設計的建議，也可以與我聯絡：ichich2013@gmail.com

[CSSconf.eu 2013] Harry Roberts - Normalising designs for better quality CSS
觀看次數：728
css
it's
a
real
mouthful
my
thread
it's
rationalizing
designs
they're
really
significantly
sir
so
the
next
sort
of
40
saying
nerdy
designers
a
lot
of
the
time
people's
ps
ds
when
they're
not
designed
stuff
and
telling
designers
no
you
can't
designers
here
at
me
know
I
can't
build
that
we
shouldn't
weren't
chosen
weren't
asked
to
speak
we
twitter
i'd
live
to
see
people's
particularly
designers
I
don't
if
they're
any
sort
of
designers
in
the
in
open
up
discussions
see
whatever
annex
any
disagreements
are
really
welcome
least
a
full-time
pastor
so
that's
so
rationalizing
designs
and
taking
up
to
you've
probably
heard
of
sky
you've
with
people
and
people's
opinions
and
two-and-a-half
years
ago
i've
started
it's
a
codebase
that's
lasted
two
and
a
importantly
maintainable
one
thing
I
something
maintainable
and
easiest
where
designers
programmers
still
sort
of
dig
is
that
we're
delivering
websites
and
websites
are
built
on
curd
we're
not
delivering
designs
not
delivering
prints
if
we're
not
delivering
psd
s
that's
come
across
I
don't
like
i'm
patronizing
designers
I
don't
know
sound
like
i'm
we
shouldn't
the
kind
of
sights
i'm
about
the
facebook's
the
google+
apps
appropriate
for
a
photographer's
making
compromises
now
compromises
a
very
objectively
one
thing
it's
really
designers
because
a
psd
for
it
might
me
with
a
photoshop
file
and
i'll
start
browser
but
importantly
no
means
no
if
a
opinions
are
just
as
valid
as
mine
and
if
they're
adamant
that
they
want
discussions
are
half
with
designs
at
sky
one-liners
i'm
a
sucker
for
a
sound
bite
pixels
in
photoshop
have
it'll
tell
me
what
brand
treatments
it's
doable
but
you
know
I
weren't
or
it's
doable
but
I
don't
want
to
or
I
doesn't
mean
we
should
just
cuz
we
can't
reams
and
reams
of
css
to
build
crazy
replicating
a
psd
you
shouldn't
have
a
right
curd
that's
what
you
work
with
day-in
day-out
should
and
i've
spelled
doesn't
wrong
scene
in
jurassic
Park
where
they're
case
bringing
dinosaurs
back
wasn't
too
device
it's
kind
of
a
misguided
effort
designers
that
we've
done
some
great
that
i'm
getting
designers
to
think
tinkering
in
first
a
shop
that's
really
conversations
I
have
with
the
design
with
typically
an
80/20
rule
loosely
sound
like
micro
optimizer
micro
optimizations
will
add
up
to
over
up
to
sizeable
servings
this
is
I
know
he's
I
know
he's
winding
me
up
designers
but
I
won't
build
something
matching
ps
ds
a
front-end
developer
has
judge
a
builder's
abilities
on
how
well
designs
in
the
browser
is
really
this
site
is
two-and-a-half
years
old
of
just
matching
ps
ds
pixel
for
pixel
convoluted
and
nasty
codebase
one
thing
replicate
a
psd
the
batter
i've
got
at
two
page
headers
you
know
there's
that's
time
to
go
back
and
refactor
it's
ferreting
I
see
the
point
it's
like
a
state
that's
a
normalization
it's
not
spotting
repetition
so
nicole
this
dealt
with
normalization
and
and
spotting
repetitions
are
really
useful
are
things
that
nicole's
dealt
with
example
we've
got
a
header
footer
on
a
similar
padding
values
they're
only
two
normalization
is
the
start
but
their
take
these
normalizations
put
them
in
little
bundles
that
we
can
reuse
this
we've
now
normalized
this
design
pattern
we've
we've
shared
that
20
it's
still
very
tightly
coupled
we
can't
another
selector
to
that
list
so
we've
into
abstracted
clusters
so
we
have
a
way
of
taking
those
normalizations
and
have
sprints
where
they've
just
got
refactoring
work
to
do
and
I
hate
refactoring
I
think
it's
so
dull
so
what
refactoring
your
curd
or
i'll
just
do
my
you
don't
enjoy
refactoring
kurd
then
with
with
designers
is
that
they're
google+
subjective
designs
and
distillers
down
a
fork
in
the
curd
so
let's
say
we've
red
all
these
modifications
all
these
sort
of
tell
designers
they
can't
have
examples
now
when
I
submitted
the
a
baseline
height
of
24
pixels
can
underpin
the
piece
of
the
sizing
and
loose
selector
why
why
38
where's
that
a
code
base
that
you
can't
rationalize
because
I
see
that
there's
38
pixels
a
around
this
38
that's
inexplicable
this
rationalize
it's
hard
to
make
sense
of
and
called
ui
sizing
scales
so
we've
got
this
24
pixels
that
underpins
our
our
this
is
a
very
very
methodological
methyl
I
won't
try
and
sell
up
word
it's
we've
got
a
caption
that's
one
pixel
larger
here
we've
got
skirt
for
normalization
why
we
got
this
slight
piggyback
here
kamel
elements
we've
font
sizes
on
paragraphs
or
on
lists
just
micro
optimizations
to
cut
bits
out
of
a
code
base
you
shouldn't
need
a
font
we're
further
at
the
dom
it's
a
body
should
be
our
entire
site's
typography
sorted
you
shouldn't
really
need
any
is
all
part
of
normalizing
and
rationalizing
and
abstracting
designs
some
pseudo
elements
and
css
gradients
to
this
I
really
don't
think
they're
image
or
base64
or
css
gradients
and
and
it
creates
like
a
bevel
effect
so
but
it's
the
80/20
rule
we've
got
gradients
so
they're
kind
of
moral
is
if
normalize
and
alter
the
designs
don't
speak
to
the
designers
but
don't
just
go
and
do
it
but
rationalize
and
pare
designs
rationalizing
designs
are
worked
very
than
all
our
competitors
and
it's
all
down
to
us
of
rationalizing
and
normalizing
these
designs
just
to
keep

相關影片

加Line好友 每日8AM 推播1單字

加入好友

其他人正在學習的單字

1. has
2024-04-29 13:11
2. created
2024-04-29 13:11
3. tall
2024-04-29 13:11
4. pity
2024-04-29 13:11
5. lately
2024-04-29 13:11
6. heavy
2024-04-29 13:11
7. invented
2024-04-29 13:11
8. instead
2024-04-29 13:11
9. part
2024-04-29 13:11
10. some
2024-04-29 13:10
11. mad
2024-04-29 13:10
12. everywhere
2024-04-29 13:10
13. trailer
2024-04-29 13:10
14. decent
2024-04-29 13:10
15. fight
2024-04-29 13:10

本月觀看影片單字排行榜

本月查閱單字排行榜

本月聆聽單字排行榜