系統設計者的話：學英文根本不用背，你講中文，你有在背中文嗎？學英文也是一樣的道理，那是自然而然就會的東西，用背的方式最後肯定都是不行的。 更多...

最好的學習就是有英文的父母，不斷的跟你說話、耐心的教導你，時間長了，你也就慢慢就融入其中了。

但是我們沒有英文父母怎麼辦？看影片學英文就學的起來嗎？學不起來。

我們從小到大，也看過了不少英文電影，至少也看過1、200部也跑不掉，但是為什麼看了這麼多的英文電影，英文還是很爛呢？

主要的原因是我們沒有從基礎性的強化學習。舉個例子，西方的幼兒出生時，他至少聽了各種大人講英文至少聽了2年，才慢慢開始說英文、與大人互動。

而且都是一字一句慢慢的說、慢慢的教、漸進式的、慢慢的、越來越習慣、越來越聽的懂、越來越會說的過程。

那麼我們看的影片、電影過程中，都是大人成熟型的講話速度、方式、語調，我們怎麼可能跟的上？

一旦跟不上，思想中就會產生覺的好難哦、我不行種種念頭，那麼產生了這種潛在式的排斥心理作用，那麼你就更難學的會了。


所以我們必須打好基礎、深厚的基礎，萬丈高樓平地起，唯有打下深厚的基礎，後面你走的路才會越來越順。

程式界裏有句話，程式債欠的越多，最後就只能放棄。學英文也是一樣，英文單字債欠的越多，你就直接上來文法、句型、語調，最後也只能放棄。

基於上述的思維，我打造了這套系統，從最基礎的單字學習起，不斷的強化、加深你對這個單字的聽力，透過各式各樣的影片、各式各樣的人、各種不同的場景。

就只是為了訓練一個單字的聽力，無數的人跟你講同一個單字，講個20遍、50篇、100遍(且不重覆)，我就不信學不起來。


這套系統做出來後，我自己在使用的過程中，確實真的能聽出來他們講的這個單字，而且他們講的速度再快也能聽的出來。

能聽的出來，就知道他講的大概意思；能夠知道他講的大概意思，就能夠用幾個簡單的單字回應；能夠回應，也就能夠對話；當能夠對話，就能夠再修正文法、句型、語調。


我的目地就是希望自己至少能聽的懂人家在說什麼，用英文跟人家對話，大家共同努力、學習。若有其它想法或對這套系統設計的建議，也可以與我聯絡：ichich2013@gmail.com

Angelina Fabbro - CSS Levels Up [CSSconf.eu 2013]
觀看次數：468
was
at
dais
comp
us
and
I
didn't
go
to
angelina
favreau
I
work
for
mozilla
and
time
i'm
actually
interacting
with
that
does
jwt
verification
for
in-app
workshops
for
example
for
a
firefox
OS
kampf
on
shadow
dom
and
we've
had
lots
you're
good
at
you
know
communicating
you're
gonna
talk
at
jas
comp
i'm
like
that's
great
jed
and
he
and
I
were
catching
up
are
web
components
i'm
like
well
web
dom
html
imports
html5
is
right
like
we've
you've
been
it
doesn't
just
refer
to
html5
and
so
was
the
first
spec
was
published
in
1996
published
in
1998
a
superset
of
css
one
are
aural
style
sheets
bi-directional
removing
poorly
implemented
features
it
was
iterated
and
tweaked
for
a
long
and
the
earliest
module
drafts
were
in
compartmentalize
them
and
modularize
css3
is
a
monolithic
version
but
in
css3
or
perme
that
the
advent
of
css3
sort
of
be
individually
versioned
with
things
like
media
queries
namespaces
official
recommendations
and
i'll
talk
a
recommendations
mean
in
a
moment
so
css
contributor
to
the
w3c
specifications
he
is
css
for
coming
and
he's
like
there's
somebody
started
tweeting
they're
like
like
javascript
and
css
2
it's
just
I
so
the
w3c
working
groups
spec
browser
specifications
like
I
mentioned
are
because
specifications
are
not
written
user
agent
the
browser
that
you're
using
browser
implementers
should
you
know
don't
have
as
many
headaches
with
things
like
cross
browser
compatibility
and
so
the
programmers
that
are
implementing
specifications
you
can
learn
basically
modifying
like
tags
h1
color
equals
blue
interestingly
enough
is
inside
of
a
style
type
text/javascript
which
is
problem
for
accessibility
usability
I
working
drafts
the
w3c
also
solicits
for
actually
you
know
browser
vendors
can
css
variables
now
we're
going
to
start
shipping
implementations
which
sort
of
implies
major
browsers
so
for
example
if
say
chrome
and
firefox
or
firefox
and
that
we're
done
after
proposed
there's
no
more
recommendations
after
this
feature
should
be
implementing
the
browser
is
good
we're
done
with
it
at
right
now
css
level
3
selectors
are
selectors
and
many
cs3
or
css3
level
modules
css
level
3
particles
like
a
timeline
or
not
a
timeline
of
standardized
and
put
into
browsers
css
4
at
the
corner
a
bevel
a
diagonal
slice
this
because
there
weren't
any
examples
vero
has
done
with
her
border-radius
can
do
with
border-radius
having
fractional
unit
for
describing
this
but
then
ten
pixels
and
that
one
fractional
example
here
we've
defined
a
four
pixel
black
but
then
we've
used
the
fractional
browser
shouldn't
implement
them
in
red
what
level
for
media
queries
introduces
is
luminosity
and
luminosity
will
allow
assumptions
across
devices
about
like
specifying
the
image
set
the
user
agent
anyway
the
last
one
is
css
selectors
level
4
so
css
selectors
level
4
lot
of
pre
processors
so
I
feel
like
you
playing
catch-up
and
that
pre
processors
a
browser
hasn't
implemented
but
there's
look
at
the
things
that
pre
processors
css
variables
and
and
other
sort
of
logic
contin
combinator's
and
stuff
like
that
and
by
implementing
those
and
specifications
go
as
well
so
I
haven't
like
the
css
selectors
level
for
is
text-decorationunderline
with
matches
div
that's
a
header
and
a
footer
and
I
potential
not
sort
of
self-explanatory
selectors
to
saw
it
so
there's
there's
actually
an
exclamation
mark
in
there
which
i'm
not
but
we've
got
the
exclamation
mark
with
to
do
that
for
both
inputs
and
anchors
just
just
credits
here
there's
a
really
selectors
um
if
you
I
haven't
pushed
if
you
follow
me
on
twitter
at
angelina
opinions
on
it
share
them
and
polyfills
they're
sel
is
a
tiny
tiny
selector
I
very
kind
of
like
sizzle
but
they've
vertical-alignmiddle
should
actually
be
things
to
be
nice
and
interoperable
on
wwww
style
mailing
list
that's
specific
the
browser
then
there's
lists
for
that
about
the
browser
and
that's
that's
fine
very
much
I
am
angelina
magnum
on
the
world
at
angelina
at
mozillacom

相關影片

加Line好友 每日8AM 推播1單字

加入好友

其他人正在學習的單字

1. ring
2024-04-29 02:53
2. education
2024-04-29 02:53
3. samson
2024-04-29 02:53
4. combat
2024-04-29 02:53
5. views
2024-04-29 02:53
6. bank
2024-04-29 02:53
7. work
2024-04-29 02:53
8. gotten
2024-04-29 02:52
9. illustrate
2024-04-29 02:52
10. ivy
2024-04-29 02:52
11. issues
2024-04-29 02:52
12. means
2024-04-29 02:52
13. fairly
2024-04-29 02:52
14. lazy
2024-04-29 02:52
15. apologize
2024-04-29 02:52

本月觀看影片單字排行榜

本月查閱單字排行榜

本月聆聽單字排行榜