系統設計者的話：學英文根本不用背，你講中文，你有在背中文嗎？學英文也是一樣的道理，那是自然而然就會的東西，用背的方式最後肯定都是不行的。 更多...

最好的學習就是有英文的父母，不斷的跟你說話、耐心的教導你，時間長了，你也就慢慢就融入其中了。

但是我們沒有英文父母怎麼辦？看影片學英文就學的起來嗎？學不起來。

我們從小到大，也看過了不少英文電影，至少也看過1、200部也跑不掉，但是為什麼看了這麼多的英文電影，英文還是很爛呢？

主要的原因是我們沒有從基礎性的強化學習。舉個例子，西方的幼兒出生時，他至少聽了各種大人講英文至少聽了2年，才慢慢開始說英文、與大人互動。

而且都是一字一句慢慢的說、慢慢的教、漸進式的、慢慢的、越來越習慣、越來越聽的懂、越來越會說的過程。

那麼我們看的影片、電影過程中，都是大人成熟型的講話速度、方式、語調，我們怎麼可能跟的上？

一旦跟不上，思想中就會產生覺的好難哦、我不行種種念頭，那麼產生了這種潛在式的排斥心理作用，那麼你就更難學的會了。


所以我們必須打好基礎、深厚的基礎，萬丈高樓平地起，唯有打下深厚的基礎，後面你走的路才會越來越順。

程式界裏有句話，程式債欠的越多，最後就只能放棄。學英文也是一樣，英文單字債欠的越多，你就直接上來文法、句型、語調，最後也只能放棄。

基於上述的思維，我打造了這套系統，從最基礎的單字學習起，不斷的強化、加深你對這個單字的聽力，透過各式各樣的影片、各式各樣的人、各種不同的場景。

就只是為了訓練一個單字的聽力，無數的人跟你講同一個單字，講個20遍、50篇、100遍(且不重覆)，我就不信學不起來。


這套系統做出來後，我自己在使用的過程中，確實真的能聽出來他們講的這個單字，而且他們講的速度再快也能聽的出來。

能聽的出來，就知道他講的大概意思；能夠知道他講的大概意思，就能夠用幾個簡單的單字回應；能夠回應，也就能夠對話；當能夠對話，就能夠再修正文法、句型、語調。


我的目地就是希望自己至少能聽的懂人家在說什麼，用英文跟人家對話，大家共同努力、學習。若有其它想法或對這套系統設計的建議，也可以與我聯絡：ichich2013@gmail.com

Glen Maddern: The Rise of Modular Style - CSSConf.Asia 2015
觀看次數：378
javascript
event
in
australia
called
this
this
progression
and
i'm
calling
constrained
by
machines
i'm
gonna
go
all
compiler
by
grace
hopper
she
wrote
in
a
1952
she
had
a
running
compiler
but
of
the
web
in
2008
firefox
was
at
winning
javascript
of
2008
had
started
itself
the
plug-in
ecosystem
was
pretty
sure
that
you
weren't
clobbering
2008
Google
came
out
with
chrome
I
don't
faster
than
the
javascript
interpreters
javascript
to
really
come
javascript
is
very
fragmented
that
if
v8
spidermonkey
javascript
cool
they
server-side
javascript
there
is
this
in
2009
nodejs
comes
out
i'm
sure
a
lot
cole
who
was
also
blogging
and
of
wondrous
events
in
javascript
he'd
that
that's
what's
happening
with
css
at
that
css
is
undergoing
a
change
and
that
term
commonjs
it's
sort
of
not
dependencies
in
javascript
no
jess
modular
exports
and
what
it
did
to
that
had
namespace
widget
through
x
equals
explicitly
export
everything
you
make
namespace
directory
so
of
course
that's
systems
in
it
and
that's
true
but
the
javascript
and
it
was
successful
npm
on
npm
by
changing
the
ecosystem
in
javascript
that
revolutionized
what
have
200000
packages
of
npm
what
makes
that
browserify
browserify
is
in
the
similar
once
it
stubs
out
the
AP
is
browserify
a
new
version
javascript
we'd
still
be
waiting
it's
still
not
solidified
so
this
the
human
interface
css
as
the
and
professionals
who
I
think
was
sixty-four
percent
of
people
used
sass
interoperable
css
which
we
finally
sort
to
inert
sorry
to
pseudo
selectors
import
and
export
they
can
pass
the
didn't
change
anything
there's
no
runtime
dependencies
it's
just
css
you
compiles
it
it
adds
an
export
line
as
metadata
the
export
the
Styles
don't
change
the
selectors
don't
change
it's
they
get
compiled
to
different
hashes
or
predictability
about
the
output
css
on
the
right-hand
side
but
i
can
import
order
unpredictability
that
you
might
browserify
output
it's
the
translation
a
compiled
target
it's
not
a
human
pm
browserify
it's
a
set
of
and
what's
javascript
and
how
these
there's
nothing
preventing
us
selectors
using
characters
you
wouldn't
great
it
saves
and
bites
but
it's
not
as
every
selector
in
that
site
is
an
emoji
efficacious
oak
it's
also
actually
duplicates
of
selectors
you
can
see
the
I
actually
think
minifying
to
emoji
is
by
defining
a
file
format
that
unlocks
webpack
browserify
giving
a
machine
contextual
styles
not
contextual
just
our
node
and
npm
wouldn't
have
taken
off
scalable
and
more
maintainable
using
a
problem
that
i've
encountered
that
one
of
those
classes
because
there's
is
that
if
you're
designing
something
haven't
finished
designing
you
can
get
we're
trying
to
fix
it
so
that's
my
rant
that's
an
accessibility
and
functional
lot
of
overriding
and
overriding
is
bad
matches
the
top
and
the
third-to-last
works
great
conceptually
it's
beautiful
a
responsive
redesign
that
takes
4g
even
on
a
macbook
pro
I
think
it
pegs
the
topic
of
coding
for
newcomers
coders
then
maybe
that
contributes
to
a
work
well
it's
a
one-to-one
replacement
extending
and
composers
are
identical
in
it
does
is
it
rewrites
all
those
classes
rules
you're
using
it
generates
these
classes
it
exports
those
classes
so
that
classes
as
Mark
already
demonstrated
and
that
severely
reduces
the
number
of
can't
use
it
in
a
pseudo
selector
you
can't
use
it
at
a
nested
selector
it
has
of
classes
the
type
of
classes
what
the
wiring
up
the
dependencies
building
a
concatenated
because
it's
just
normal
generates
for
classes
and
what's
good
dividers
sizes
animations
effects
be
a
vertical
flexbox
and
a
masthead
seven
classes
for
the
div
but
you
don't
of
interoperable
css
css
modules
hasn't
like
it
is
then
modular
styling
comes
through
composing
classes
being
able
to
components
so
it's
an
area
of
intense
contributing
discussions
patches
please
they're
compiled
or
what
at
the
moment
when
you
have
100
components
but
they
components
say
but
I
quite
a
big
web
app
there's
hundreds
of
components
in
there
components
is
an
art
it's
the
same
way
had
that
same
progression
using
angular
five
variants
and
you
don't
want
all
variations
one
of
the
things
that
i've
seen
one
of
the
approaches
i've
seen
is
would
live
in
a
subdirectory
or
everybody's
mileage
is
varying
at
the

相關影片

加Line好友 每日8AM 推播1單字

加入好友

其他人正在學習的單字

1. after
2024-04-29 03:05
2. die
2024-04-29 03:05
3. glamorous
2024-04-29 03:05
4. colleges
2024-04-29 03:05
5. said
2024-04-29 03:05
6. tired
2024-04-29 03:05
7. eddie
2024-04-29 03:05
8. Option
2024-04-29 03:05
9. fortunate
2024-04-29 03:05
10. um
2024-04-29 03:05
11. gosh
2024-04-29 03:05
12. family
2024-04-29 03:05
13. russell
2024-04-29 03:05
14. processing
2024-04-29 03:04
15. would
2024-04-29 03:04

本月觀看影片單字排行榜

本月查閱單字排行榜

本月聆聽單字排行榜